Home / Technologies / Bunny CDN vs Firebase Hosting
Bunny CDN vs Firebase Hosting: who uses which
Bunny CDN is on more sites: 92,176 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 106.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Bunny CDN | Firebase Hosting |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 42,076 | 425 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 4,857 | 6 |
| .de in Germany | 4,343 | 5 |
| .fr in France | 4,195 | 2 |
| .uk in the UK | 3,834 | 12 |
| .org on .org | 3,596 | 29 |
| .net on .net | 3,071 | 35 |
| .au in Australia | 1,458 | 3 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Bunny CDN or Firebase Hosting?
Bunny CDN is on more sites: 92,176 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 106.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Bunny CDN and Firebase Hosting together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Bunny CDN or Firebase Hosting as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.