Home / Technologies / bxSlider vs flatpickr
bxSlider vs flatpickr: who uses which
bxSlider is on more sites: 425,264 against 193,637 for flatpickr, about 2.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | bxSlider | flatpickr |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 173,233 | 85,204 |
| .de in Germany | 17,222 | 11,399 |
| .ru on .ru | 25,553 | 2,863 |
| .jp in Japan | 24,756 | 2,998 |
| .org on .org | 14,040 | 6,739 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 12,503 | 4,621 |
| .net on .net | 11,330 | 3,936 |
| .uk in the UK | 9,694 | 5,572 |
2,700 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, bxSlider or flatpickr?
bxSlider is on more sites: 425,264 against 193,637 for flatpickr, about 2.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use bxSlider and flatpickr together?
2,700 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using bxSlider or flatpickr as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.