Home / Technologies / bxSlider vs Three.js
bxSlider vs Three.js: who uses which
bxSlider is on more sites: 425,264 against 25,096 for Three.js, about 16.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | bxSlider | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 173,233 | 11,782 |
| .ru on .ru | 25,553 | 483 |
| .jp in Japan | 24,756 | 577 |
| .de in Germany | 17,222 | 1,393 |
| .org on .org | 14,040 | 677 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 12,503 | 279 |
| .kr in South Korea | 12,022 | 139 |
| .net on .net | 11,330 | 550 |
130 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, bxSlider or Three.js?
bxSlider is on more sites: 425,264 against 25,096 for Three.js, about 16.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use bxSlider and Three.js together?
130 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using bxSlider or Three.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.