Home / Technologies / bxSlider vs vanilla-lazyload
bxSlider vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
bxSlider is on more sites: 425,264 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 9.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | bxSlider | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 173,233 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 25,553 | 3,400 |
| .jp in Japan | 24,756 | 212 |
| .de in Germany | 17,222 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 14,040 | 986 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 12,503 | 841 |
| .net on .net | 11,330 | 954 |
| .kr in South Korea | 12,022 | 11 |
846 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, bxSlider or vanilla-lazyload?
bxSlider is on more sites: 425,264 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 9.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use bxSlider and vanilla-lazyload together?
846 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using bxSlider or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.