Home / Technologies / CacheFly vs cdnjs
CacheFly vs cdnjs: who uses which
cdnjs is on more sites: 2,610,962 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 2585.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | CacheFly | cdnjs |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 737 | 1,226,237 |
| .org on .org | 35 | 108,522 |
| .jp in Japan | 1 | 83,600 |
| .uk in the UK | 21 | 77,471 |
| .net on .net | 17 | 76,557 |
| .ru on .ru | 3 | 60,826 |
| .de in Germany | 5 | 56,525 |
| .br in Brazil | 8 | 52,314 |
144 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, CacheFly or cdnjs?
cdnjs is on more sites: 2,610,962 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 2585.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use CacheFly and cdnjs together?
144 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using CacheFly or cdnjs as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.