Home / Technologies / CacheFly vs Cloudinary
CacheFly vs Cloudinary: who uses which
Cloudinary is on more sites: 111,151 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 110.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | CacheFly | Cloudinary |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 737 | 66,519 |
| .org on .org | 35 | 5,690 |
| .net on .net | 17 | 3,075 |
| .uk in the UK | 21 | 3,030 |
| .it in Italy | 12 | 2,702 |
| .au in Australia | 7 | 2,369 |
| .es in Spain | 2 | 1,946 |
| .fr in France | 1 | 1,774 |
7 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, CacheFly or Cloudinary?
Cloudinary is on more sites: 111,151 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 110.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use CacheFly and Cloudinary together?
7 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using CacheFly or Cloudinary as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.