Home / Technologies / CacheFly vs ImageKit
CacheFly vs ImageKit: who uses which
ImageKit is on more sites: 20,547 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 20.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | CacheFly | ImageKit |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 737 | 11,398 |
| .org on .org | 35 | 1,111 |
| .net on .net | 17 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 21 | 531 |
| .in in India | 5 | 403 |
| .app on .app | 1 | 311 |
| .fr in France | 1 | 305 |
| .au in Australia | 7 | 223 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, CacheFly or ImageKit?
ImageKit is on more sites: 20,547 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 20.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use CacheFly and ImageKit together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using CacheFly or ImageKit as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.