Home / Technologies / CacheFly vs Jetpack Site Accelerator
CacheFly vs Jetpack Site Accelerator: who uses which
Jetpack Site Accelerator is on more sites: 355,343 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 351.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | CacheFly | Jetpack Site Accelerator |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 737 | 173,667 |
| .org on .org | 35 | 18,227 |
| .de in Germany | 5 | 18,082 |
| .fr in France | 1 | 12,278 |
| .net on .net | 17 | 11,647 |
| .uk in the UK | 21 | 10,705 |
| .it in Italy | 12 | 8,112 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1 | 7,445 |
5 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, CacheFly or Jetpack Site Accelerator?
Jetpack Site Accelerator is on more sites: 355,343 against 1,010 for CacheFly, about 351.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use CacheFly and Jetpack Site Accelerator together?
5 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using CacheFly or Jetpack Site Accelerator as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.