Home / Technologies / cdnjs vs Jetpack Site Accelerator
cdnjs vs Jetpack Site Accelerator: who uses which
cdnjs is on more sites: 2,610,962 against 355,343 for Jetpack Site Accelerator, about 7.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | cdnjs | Jetpack Site Accelerator |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,226,237 | 173,667 |
| .org on .org | 108,522 | 18,227 |
| .jp in Japan | 83,600 | 6,079 |
| .net on .net | 76,557 | 11,647 |
| .uk in the UK | 77,471 | 10,705 |
| .de in Germany | 56,525 | 18,082 |
| .fr in France | 52,183 | 12,278 |
| .ru on .ru | 60,826 | 3,327 |
22,543 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, cdnjs or Jetpack Site Accelerator?
cdnjs is on more sites: 2,610,962 against 355,343 for Jetpack Site Accelerator, about 7.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use cdnjs and Jetpack Site Accelerator together?
22,543 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using cdnjs or Jetpack Site Accelerator as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.