Home / Technologies / Chart.js vs lazysizes
Chart.js vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 113,967 for Chart.js, about 8.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Chart.js | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 46,879 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 7,680 | 50,865 |
| .jp in Japan | 1,259 | 35,838 |
| .ru on .ru | 913 | 34,044 |
| .org on .org | 5,155 | 25,003 |
| .net on .net | 2,396 | 22,755 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,734 | 22,214 |
| .it in Italy | 5,062 | 14,575 |
2,127 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Chart.js or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 113,967 for Chart.js, about 8.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Chart.js and lazysizes together?
2,127 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Chart.js or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.