Home / Technologies / Chart.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Chart.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Chart.js is on more sites: 113,967 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Chart.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 46,879 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 7,680 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 5,155 | 986 |
| .it in Italy | 5,062 | 504 |
| .ru on .ru | 913 | 3,400 |
| .fr in France | 3,028 | 740 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,734 | 957 |
| .net on .net | 2,396 | 954 |
125 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Chart.js or vanilla-lazyload?
Chart.js is on more sites: 113,967 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Chart.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
125 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Chart.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.