Home / Technologies / Choices.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Choices.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Choices.js is on more sites: 48,062 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Choices.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,167 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 4,241 | 885 |
| .ru on .ru | 885 | 3,400 |
| .fr in France | 2,343 | 740 |
| .org on .org | 1,942 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,438 | 957 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,064 | 841 |
| .net on .net | 895 | 954 |
53 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Choices.js or vanilla-lazyload?
Choices.js is on more sites: 48,062 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Choices.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
53 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Choices.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.