Home / Technologies / Cleave.js vs intl-tel-input
Cleave.js vs intl-tel-input: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 7,759 for Cleave.js, about 55.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Cleave.js | intl-tel-input |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,538 | 241,271 |
| .org on .org | 213 | 14,730 |
| .de in Germany | 90 | 14,251 |
| .in in India | 38 | 11,664 |
| .uk in the UK | 65 | 11,279 |
| .net on .net | 84 | 8,615 |
| .fr in France | 93 | 8,355 |
| .au in Australia | 47 | 8,090 |
1,225 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Cleave.js or intl-tel-input?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 7,759 for Cleave.js, about 55.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Cleave.js and intl-tel-input together?
1,225 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Cleave.js or intl-tel-input as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.