Home / Technologies / Cleave.js vs Lunr
Cleave.js vs Lunr: who uses which
Cleave.js is on more sites: 7,759 against 7,292 for Lunr, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Cleave.js | Lunr |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,538 | 1,996 |
| .io on .io | 25 | 1,360 |
| .org on .org | 213 | 770 |
| .ru on .ru | 435 | 43 |
| .es in Spain | 432 | 15 |
| .pm on .pm | 0 | 392 |
| .net on .net | 84 | 260 |
| .de in Germany | 90 | 198 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Cleave.js or Lunr?
Cleave.js is on more sites: 7,759 against 7,292 for Lunr, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Cleave.js and Lunr together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Cleave.js or Lunr as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.