Home / Technologies / Cloudinary vs esm.sh
Cloudinary vs esm.sh: who uses which
Cloudinary is on more sites: 111,151 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 20.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Cloudinary | esm.sh |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 66,519 | 2,307 |
| .org on .org | 5,690 | 529 |
| .net on .net | 3,075 | 184 |
| .uk in the UK | 3,030 | 52 |
| .it in Italy | 2,702 | 43 |
| .au in Australia | 2,369 | 41 |
| .es in Spain | 1,946 | 33 |
| .fr in France | 1,774 | 60 |
49 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Cloudinary or esm.sh?
Cloudinary is on more sites: 111,151 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 20.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Cloudinary and esm.sh together?
49 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Cloudinary or esm.sh as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.