Home / Technologies / Cloudinary vs Firebase Hosting
Cloudinary vs Firebase Hosting: who uses which
Cloudinary is on more sites: 111,151 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 127.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Cloudinary | Firebase Hosting |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 66,519 | 425 |
| .org on .org | 5,690 | 29 |
| .net on .net | 3,075 | 35 |
| .uk in the UK | 3,030 | 12 |
| .it in Italy | 2,702 | 1 |
| .au in Australia | 2,369 | 3 |
| .es in Spain | 1,946 | 2 |
| .fr in France | 1,774 | 2 |
4 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Cloudinary or Firebase Hosting?
Cloudinary is on more sites: 111,151 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 127.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Cloudinary and Firebase Hosting together?
4 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Cloudinary or Firebase Hosting as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.