Home / Technologies / CodePen Embed vs Intro.js
CodePen Embed vs Intro.js: who uses which
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 938 for CodePen Embed, about 3.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | CodePen Embed | Intro.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 416 | 1,350 |
| .org on .org | 25 | 484 |
| .ca in Canada | 8 | 137 |
| .net on .net | 43 | 69 |
| .br in Brazil | 5 | 106 |
| .de in Germany | 28 | 66 |
| .cn on .cn | 59 | 30 |
| .uk in the UK | 16 | 62 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, CodePen Embed or Intro.js?
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 938 for CodePen Embed, about 3.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use CodePen Embed and Intro.js together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using CodePen Embed or Intro.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.