Home / Technologies / Constructor vs RichRelevance
Constructor vs RichRelevance: who uses which
Constructor is on more sites: 294 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 5.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Constructor | RichRelevance |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 162 | 9 |
| .au in Australia | 17 | 1 |
| .uk in the UK | 11 | 2 |
| .ca in Canada | 8 | 2 |
| .de in Germany | 8 | 1 |
| .it in Italy | 3 | 4 |
| .se in Sweden | 2 | 5 |
| .br in Brazil | 2 | 4 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Constructor or RichRelevance?
Constructor is on more sites: 294 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 5.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Constructor and RichRelevance together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Constructor or RichRelevance as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.