Home / Technologies / core-js vs FilePond
core-js vs FilePond: who uses which
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 1245.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | core-js | FilePond |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,737,564 | 800 |
| .org on .org | 168,333 | 82 |
| .uk in the UK | 119,622 | 98 |
| .de in Germany | 66,751 | 119 |
| .net on .net | 65,392 | 38 |
| .au in Australia | 50,707 | 28 |
| .ca in Canada | 45,709 | 12 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 42,049 | 57 |
19 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, core-js or FilePond?
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 1245.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use core-js and FilePond together?
19 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using core-js or FilePond as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.