Home / Technologies / core-js vs lazysizes
core-js vs lazysizes: who uses which
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 932,496 for lazysizes, about 2.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | core-js | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,737,564 | 472,701 |
| .org on .org | 168,333 | 25,003 |
| .uk in the UK | 119,622 | 22,214 |
| .de in Germany | 66,751 | 50,865 |
| .net on .net | 65,392 | 22,755 |
| .au in Australia | 50,707 | 15,011 |
| .br in Brazil | 40,581 | 17,054 |
| .ca in Canada | 45,709 | 9,182 |
553 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, core-js or lazysizes?
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 932,496 for lazysizes, about 2.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use core-js and lazysizes together?
553 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using core-js or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.