Home / Technologies / core-js vs Turbolinks
core-js vs Turbolinks: who uses which
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 82.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | core-js | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,737,564 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 168,333 | 2,993 |
| .uk in the UK | 119,622 | 444 |
| .de in Germany | 66,751 | 816 |
| .net on .net | 65,392 | 757 |
| .au in Australia | 50,707 | 289 |
| .ca in Canada | 45,709 | 277 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 42,049 | 210 |
7 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, core-js or Turbolinks?
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 82.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use core-js and Turbolinks together?
7 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using core-js or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.