Home / Technologies / core-js vs vanilla-lazyload
core-js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 60.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | core-js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,737,564 | 20,712 |
| .org on .org | 168,333 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 119,622 | 957 |
| .de in Germany | 66,751 | 885 |
| .net on .net | 65,392 | 954 |
| .au in Australia | 50,707 | 471 |
| .ca in Canada | 45,709 | 779 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 42,049 | 217 |
50 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, core-js or vanilla-lazyload?
core-js is on more sites: 2,697,064 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 60.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use core-js and vanilla-lazyload together?
50 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using core-js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.