Home / Technologies / date-fns vs vanilla-lazyload
date-fns vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 15,121 for date-fns, about 3.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | date-fns | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 12,702 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 25 | 3,400 |
| .net on .net | 1,518 | 954 |
| .org on .org | 172 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 14 | 957 |
| .de in Germany | 29 | 885 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 10 | 841 |
| .ca in Canada | 3 | 779 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, date-fns or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 15,121 for date-fns, about 3.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use date-fns and vanilla-lazyload together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using date-fns or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.