Home / Technologies / date-fns vs Webpack
date-fns vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 15,121 for date-fns, about 182.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | date-fns | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 12,702 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 172 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 14 | 120,575 |
| .net on .net | 1,518 | 66,266 |
| .de in Germany | 29 | 66,965 |
| .au in Australia | 7 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 3 | 46,584 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 15 | 42,006 |
25 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, date-fns or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 15,121 for date-fns, about 182.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use date-fns and Webpack together?
25 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using date-fns or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.