Home / Technologies / Docusaurus vs LiteSpeed Cache
Docusaurus vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,659 against 10,500 for Docusaurus, about 53.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Docusaurus | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,619 | 255,306 |
| .br in Brazil | 44 | 21,432 |
| .uk in the UK | 44 | 20,858 |
| .pl in Poland | 22 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 826 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 60 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 40 | 13,133 |
| .net on .net | 351 | 12,770 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Docusaurus or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,659 against 10,500 for Docusaurus, about 53.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Docusaurus and LiteSpeed Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using Docusaurus or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.