Home / Technologies / DOMPurify vs vanilla-lazyload
DOMPurify vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
DOMPurify is on more sites: 421,276 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 9.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | DOMPurify | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 177,784 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 31,391 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 17,331 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 13,168 | 740 |
| .jp in Japan | 13,388 | 212 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,115 | 957 |
| .ru on .ru | 8,462 | 3,400 |
| .au in Australia | 9,282 | 471 |
643 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, DOMPurify or vanilla-lazyload?
DOMPurify is on more sites: 421,276 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 9.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use DOMPurify and vanilla-lazyload together?
643 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using DOMPurify or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.