Home / Technologies / Drupal vs LiteSpeed Cache
Drupal vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 254,140 for Drupal, about 2.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Drupal | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 62,658 | 255,304 |
| .org on .org | 20,322 | 16,447 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,981 | 20,858 |
| .fr in France | 11,428 | 14,644 |
| .pl in Poland | 4,009 | 20,679 |
| .br in Brazil | 2,402 | 21,432 |
| .de in Germany | 13,379 | 8,650 |
| .edu on .edu | 18,363 | 78 |
845 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Drupal or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 254,140 for Drupal, about 2.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Drupal and LiteSpeed Cache together?
845 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Drupal or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.