Home / Technologies / Apache ECharts vs vanilla-lazyload
Apache ECharts vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 10,719 for Apache ECharts, about 4.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Apache ECharts | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,828 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 69 | 3,400 |
| .cn on .cn | 1,349 | 243 |
| .net on .net | 397 | 954 |
| .org on .org | 291 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 68 | 957 |
| .de in Germany | 128 | 885 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 45 | 841 |
49 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Apache ECharts or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 10,719 for Apache ECharts, about 4.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Apache ECharts and vanilla-lazyload together?
49 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Apache ECharts or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.