Home / Technologies / Ember.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Ember.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 3,611 for Ember.js, about 12.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Ember.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 2,740 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 1 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 183 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 79 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 9 | 957 |
| .de in Germany | 13 | 885 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 4 | 841 |
| .ca in Canada | 26 | 779 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Ember.js or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 3,611 for Ember.js, about 12.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Ember.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Ember.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.