Home / Technologies / Enfold vs LiteSpeed Cache
Enfold vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 170,926 for Enfold, about 3.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Enfold | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 54,821 | 255,304 |
| .de in Germany | 36,688 | 8,650 |
| .uk in the UK | 4,247 | 20,858 |
| .br in Brazil | 1,453 | 21,432 |
| .org on .org | 6,353 | 16,447 |
| .pl in Poland | 1,688 | 20,679 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 7,784 | 13,133 |
| .fr in France | 3,963 | 14,644 |
4,260 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Enfold or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 170,926 for Enfold, about 3.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Enfold and LiteSpeed Cache together?
4,260 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Enfold or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.