Home / Technologies / Enfold vs WP Super Cache
Enfold vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 170,926 for Enfold, about 1.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Enfold | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 54,821 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 36,688 | 21,667 |
| .org on .org | 6,353 | 14,864 |
| .fr in France | 3,963 | 17,086 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 3,152 | 12,193 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 7,784 | 6,885 |
| .it in Italy | 6,698 | 6,633 |
| .ru on .ru | 614 | 12,192 |
5,902 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Enfold or WP Super Cache?
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 170,926 for Enfold, about 1.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Enfold and WP Super Cache together?
5,902 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Enfold or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.