Home / Technologies / esm.sh vs Google Cloud Storage
esm.sh vs Google Cloud Storage: who uses which
Google Cloud Storage is on more sites: 243,480 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 43.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | esm.sh | Google Cloud Storage |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 2,307 | 147,957 |
| .jp in Japan | 34 | 14,326 |
| .org on .org | 529 | 9,318 |
| .net on .net | 184 | 6,924 |
| .uk in the UK | 52 | 5,070 |
| .br in Brazil | 132 | 4,071 |
| .au in Australia | 41 | 3,915 |
| .de in Germany | 68 | 2,880 |
69 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, esm.sh or Google Cloud Storage?
Google Cloud Storage is on more sites: 243,480 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 43.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use esm.sh and Google Cloud Storage together?
69 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using esm.sh or Google Cloud Storage as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.