Home / Technologies / esm.sh vs Google Hosted Libraries
esm.sh vs Google Hosted Libraries: who uses which
Google Hosted Libraries is on more sites: 2,015,677 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 363.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | esm.sh | Google Hosted Libraries |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 2,307 | 973,491 |
| .jp in Japan | 34 | 130,179 |
| .org on .org | 529 | 78,337 |
| .net on .net | 184 | 64,112 |
| .uk in the UK | 52 | 61,705 |
| .de in Germany | 68 | 60,068 |
| .ru on .ru | 35 | 54,536 |
| .fr in France | 60 | 32,159 |
88 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, esm.sh or Google Hosted Libraries?
Google Hosted Libraries is on more sites: 2,015,677 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 363.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use esm.sh and Google Hosted Libraries together?
88 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using esm.sh or Google Hosted Libraries as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.