Home / Technologies / esm.sh vs Microsoft Ajax CDN
esm.sh vs Microsoft Ajax CDN: who uses which
Microsoft Ajax CDN is on more sites: 43,745 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 7.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | esm.sh | Microsoft Ajax CDN |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 2,307 | 20,069 |
| .org on .org | 529 | 3,845 |
| .uk in the UK | 52 | 3,387 |
| .net on .net | 184 | 1,187 |
| .dk in Denmark | 19 | 1,011 |
| .fr in France | 60 | 786 |
| .it in Italy | 43 | 802 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 59 | 765 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, esm.sh or Microsoft Ajax CDN?
Microsoft Ajax CDN is on more sites: 43,745 against 5,546 for esm.sh, about 7.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use esm.sh and Microsoft Ajax CDN together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using esm.sh or Microsoft Ajax CDN as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.