Home / Technologies / EX.CO vs Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager)
EX.CO vs Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager): who uses which
Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) is on more sites: 7,155 against 35 for EX.CO, about 204.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | EX.CO | Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 27 | 3,819 |
| .org on .org | 2 | 450 |
| .ca in Canada | 0 | 244 |
| .au in Australia | 0 | 190 |
| .net on .net | 0 | 159 |
| .uk in the UK | 0 | 152 |
| .pl in Poland | 0 | 125 |
| .fr in France | 0 | 110 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, EX.CO or Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager)?
Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) is on more sites: 7,155 against 35 for EX.CO, about 204.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use EX.CO and Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using EX.CO or Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.