Home / Technologies / Ezoic vs Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager)
Ezoic vs Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager): who uses which
Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) is on more sites: 7,155 against 4,546 for Ezoic, about 1.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Ezoic | Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,337 | 3,819 |
| .org on .org | 164 | 450 |
| .net on .net | 160 | 159 |
| .ca in Canada | 11 | 244 |
| .uk in the UK | 45 | 152 |
| .au in Australia | 7 | 190 |
| .fr in France | 54 | 110 |
| .pl in Poland | 15 | 125 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Ezoic or Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager)?
Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) is on more sites: 7,155 against 4,546 for Ezoic, about 1.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Ezoic and Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Ezoic or Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.