Home / Technologies / FilePond vs fullPage.js
FilePond vs fullPage.js: who uses which
fullPage.js is on more sites: 13,127 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 6.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | fullPage.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 6,757 |
| .kr in South Korea | 7 | 827 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 389 |
| .cn on .cn | 2 | 476 |
| .ru on .ru | 83 | 357 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 322 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 229 |
| .jp in Japan | 6 | 296 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or fullPage.js?
fullPage.js is on more sites: 13,127 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 6.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and fullPage.js together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or fullPage.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.