Home / Technologies / FilePond vs Inertia.js
FilePond vs Inertia.js: who uses which
Inertia.js is on more sites: 30,091 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 13.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | Inertia.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 16,272 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 2,965 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 690 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 625 |
| .app on .app | 4 | 634 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 493 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 63 | 393 |
| .br in Brazil | 52 | 390 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or Inertia.js?
Inertia.js is on more sites: 30,091 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 13.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and Inertia.js together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or Inertia.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.