Home / Technologies / FilePond vs jQuery Migrate
FilePond vs jQuery Migrate: who uses which
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 4840.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | jQuery Migrate |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 4,393,843 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 758,077 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 464,402 |
| .fr in France | 53 | 315,453 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 291,468 |
| .it in Italy | 34 | 287,185 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 243,800 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 63 | 243,459 |
405 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or jQuery Migrate?
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 4840.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and jQuery Migrate together?
405 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or jQuery Migrate as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.