Home / Technologies / FilePond vs jQuery Mobile
FilePond vs jQuery Mobile: who uses which
jQuery Mobile is on more sites: 38,396 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 17.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | jQuery Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 13,681 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 3,157 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 2,942 |
| .it in Italy | 34 | 1,375 |
| .fr in France | 53 | 1,132 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 979 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 882 |
| .pl in Poland | 29 | 930 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or jQuery Mobile?
jQuery Mobile is on more sites: 38,396 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 17.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and jQuery Mobile together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or jQuery Mobile as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.