Home / Technologies / FilePond vs lazysizes
FilePond vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 430.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 50,865 |
| .jp in Japan | 6 | 35,838 |
| .ru on .ru | 83 | 34,044 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 25,003 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 22,755 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 22,214 |
| .br in Brazil | 52 | 17,054 |
40 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 430.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and lazysizes together?
40 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.