Home / Technologies / FilePond vs particles.js
FilePond vs particles.js: who uses which
particles.js is on more sites: 74,453 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 34.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | particles.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 33,280 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 3,460 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 2,745 |
| .fr in France | 53 | 1,894 |
| .br in Brazil | 52 | 1,746 |
| .it in Italy | 34 | 1,730 |
| .ru on .ru | 83 | 1,651 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 1,605 |
21 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or particles.js?
particles.js is on more sites: 74,453 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 34.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and particles.js together?
21 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or particles.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.