Home / Technologies / FilePond vs PDF.js
FilePond vs PDF.js: who uses which
PDF.js is on more sites: 13,048 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 6.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | PDF.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 4,907 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 875 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 828 |
| .it in Italy | 34 | 446 |
| .fr in France | 53 | 384 |
| .ru on .ru | 83 | 290 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 211 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 266 |
9 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or PDF.js?
PDF.js is on more sites: 13,048 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 6.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and PDF.js together?
9 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or PDF.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.