Home / Technologies / FilePond vs PixiJS
FilePond vs PixiJS: who uses which
PixiJS is on more sites: 3,611 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 1.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | PixiJS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 1,736 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 175 |
| .it in Italy | 34 | 147 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 71 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 51 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 107 |
| .ru on .ru | 83 | 48 |
| .fr in France | 53 | 73 |
13 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or PixiJS?
PixiJS is on more sites: 3,611 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 1.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and PixiJS together?
13 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or PixiJS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.