Home / Technologies / FilePond vs Socket.IO
FilePond vs Socket.IO: who uses which
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 5.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 4,748 |
| .br in Brazil | 52 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 558 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 376 |
| .ru on .ru | 83 | 285 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 137 |
| .in in India | 25 | 176 |
| .hu in Hungary | 11 | 166 |
21 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or Socket.IO?
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 5.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and Socket.IO together?
21 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.