Home / Technologies / FilePond vs Three.js
FilePond vs Three.js: who uses which
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 11.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 11,782 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 1,393 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 677 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 550 |
| .jp in Japan | 6 | 577 |
| .ru on .ru | 83 | 483 |
| .fr in France | 53 | 490 |
| .it in Italy | 34 | 498 |
19 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or Three.js?
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 11.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and Three.js together?
19 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or Three.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.