Home / Technologies / FilePond vs Underscore.js
FilePond vs Underscore.js: who uses which
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 566.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | Underscore.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 529,209 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 73,489 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 55,195 |
| .fr in France | 53 | 36,310 |
| .it in Italy | 34 | 35,400 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 34,026 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 63 | 25,391 |
| .pl in Poland | 29 | 23,784 |
102 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 566.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and Underscore.js together?
102 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or Underscore.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.