Home / Technologies / FilePond vs Webpack
FilePond vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 1273.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FilePond | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 800 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 82 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 98 | 120,575 |
| .de in Germany | 119 | 66,965 |
| .net on .net | 38 | 66,266 |
| .au in Australia | 28 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 12 | 46,584 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 57 | 42,006 |
6 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FilePond or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 2,165 for FilePond, about 1273.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FilePond and Webpack together?
6 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FilePond or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.