Home / Technologies / Firebase Hosting vs Google Cloud Storage
Firebase Hosting vs Google Cloud Storage: who uses which
Google Cloud Storage is on more sites: 243,480 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 280.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Firebase Hosting | Google Cloud Storage |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 425 | 147,957 |
| .jp in Japan | 16 | 14,326 |
| .org on .org | 29 | 9,318 |
| .net on .net | 35 | 6,924 |
| .uk in the UK | 12 | 5,070 |
| .br in Brazil | 4 | 4,071 |
| .au in Australia | 3 | 3,915 |
| .de in Germany | 5 | 2,880 |
25 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Firebase Hosting or Google Cloud Storage?
Google Cloud Storage is on more sites: 243,480 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 280.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Firebase Hosting and Google Cloud Storage together?
25 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Firebase Hosting or Google Cloud Storage as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.