Home / Technologies / Firebase Hosting vs Microsoft Ajax CDN
Firebase Hosting vs Microsoft Ajax CDN: who uses which
Microsoft Ajax CDN is on more sites: 43,745 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 50.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Firebase Hosting | Microsoft Ajax CDN |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 425 | 20,069 |
| .org on .org | 29 | 3,845 |
| .uk in the UK | 12 | 3,387 |
| .net on .net | 35 | 1,187 |
| .dk in Denmark | 0 | 1,011 |
| .it in Italy | 1 | 802 |
| .fr in France | 2 | 786 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 6 | 765 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Firebase Hosting or Microsoft Ajax CDN?
Microsoft Ajax CDN is on more sites: 43,745 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 50.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Firebase Hosting and Microsoft Ajax CDN together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Firebase Hosting or Microsoft Ajax CDN as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.